Utilizing double magnetism, double cavity, and double voice coil, TFZ No.3 offers a smooth and non-tiring listening experience to fellow audiophiles.
With the emerging of Chi-Fi in the audiophiles market, more outstanding in-ear monitors (IEMs) are available in the lower price range.
This could be good news and bad news to fellow audiophiles – more choices and too many choices.
The Fragrant Zither (TFZ) is a China-based IEMs manufacturer that focuses on a wide range of IEMs. From the top of the line – Tx Bear 10 to the entry-level – T1 Galaxy, TFZ aims to provide a listening solution for audiophiles – be it entry-level or top of the line. We will review on TFZ No.3, a midrange IEM from TFZ.
- Sub-bass rumbles
- Detachable cable
- Sturdy nozzle
- Rigid acrylic shell
- Shell could be too big for certain users
- Highs might not be sufficiently energetic
Unboxing
TFZ No.3 has a very simple but modern packaging. Nowadays, IEMs packagings are getting more complicated and a lot of manufacturers are throwing in less useful accessories to make their packagings look grand.
I am glad that TFZ focuses on a simple yet useful packaging.
The outer layer of the packaging is a white hard sleeve with the branding on it. Removing the sleeve, one can immediately spot the TFZ No.3. Underneath the TFZ No.3, you can find a box containing the cable for No.3. Besides that, there is an accessories box. Opening the accessories box, you can expect:
- 3 pairs of wide bore silicone ear tips
- 3 pairs of narrow bore silicone ear tips
- A white soft pouch
- A cloth clip
Technical Specifications
- Driver: 11.4mm Double magnetism, double cavity, double voice coil ,tesla magnetic group
- Magnetism material: NdFeB N50
- Diaphragm: Diamond diaphragm
- Frequency range: 5Hz-40000Hz
- Impedance: 20ohm
- Sensitivity: 108dB
- Cable material: 0.78mm detachable silver-plated cable
Build
The build quality of TFZ No.3 is excellent – rigid and sturdy. The crystal clear acrylic shell allows users to see through the 11.4mm dynamic drivers in the shell. Facing the outer side is a silver faceplate – eyecatching.

The brass nozzle improves the overall build quality of this IEMs. As mentioned in my earlier review of Simgot EK3 and Campfire Audio Polaris V2, IEMs nozzle is always the weakest part of the IEMs. TFZ successfully mitigate this issue by implementing a brass nozzle.

On top of the shell, users can find a non-recessed 0.78mm 2-pin connector. This implementation may create some problems during cable-rolling. However, after testing several aftermarket cables, the protruded 2-pin connector does not create any hectic problem for me.

The cable provided in the packaging is a 3.5mm unbalanced terminated to 0.78mm 2-pin silver plated copper (SPC) cable. The cable is coated using a layer of rubber as a strain relief to protect the cable. There is no chin slider on this cable but due to the softness of the cable, it does not create serious microphonics when I am moving around.

Fitting and Isolation
The overall fitting of TFZ No.3 is average. The slightly large shell stretches my ear a little horizontally. I can get a good isolation and this made No.3 my travel companion during this review period. There is a vent to mitigate driver flex in the inner side of the shell so it minimizes the noises from surrounding to disturb the overall listening experience.

The shell might be a little too huge for those with smaller ears especially females. I could not find a good fit with the provided ear tips but ear tips rolling can be easily done. Based on my testing, SpinFit CP100, MandarinEs Symbio W and Final Audio Type E ear tips can fit perfectly on No.3.
Pairing
For this review, I paired the TFZ No.3 to Radsone EarStudio100 (ES100) which is connected to my LG G6 via LDAC.

Sound
I do not have much experience with Chi-Fi except for major brands like FiiO, iBasso, and Simgot so I am a little unsure what to expect initially.
The first impression on TFZ No.3 is jaw-dropping
The overall sound signature is at the warmer side, making No.3 comfortable for long listening. The soundstage is sufficiently wide and the depth is amazing. Thanks to the high-performance dynamic driver.
Due to the good performance in the width and depth on the soundstage, the separation and layering are produced in an accurate manner. The fidelity and clarity are above average for an IEMs within USD$200 price range.

Lows
TFZ No.3 has a very good sub-bass extension. It rumbles upon call. I would definitely recommend this IEMs to bassheads. I believe it can fulfill their craves in the lows especially sub-bass.
It is hard for you to stop yourself from stomping your feet together with the rhythm when the bass kicks in
The attack and decay speed of the bass is above average for a dynamic driver. The speed is at a sweet spot – giving the overall texture a sense of warmness and emotions. Due to the good layering, no bleeding towards other frequency regions is spotted. This creates a good overall fidelity and I enjoy the rumbles from No.3.

Mids
The mids is well-positioned in the center of the stage – neither too shouty nor too laid back. This makes the overall presentation enjoyable one. The mids body is full and lush. Due to the air injected by the dynamic drivers and the smooth transition from the lows, the mids is warm, full of emotions and breathy.
For vocals, the body is rich. For those who love coffee, I would like to describe this as my favorite beverage in Singapore – Kopi Gao (Americano with an extra shot of espresso).
The presentation is very energetic and the warmth provided the emotions – it is like a real scene.

Highs
The highs are a little bit shy among the three frequency spectrum. This could be a common characteristic for a warm IEMs. There is no sibilance found during the review period of almost a month. This could bring a fatigue-free listening experience for users.
Although the presentation is polite and conserved, it does have a good extension without disturbances and distortions.
There is sufficient air injected in the treble – making the presentation airy and hence improving the fidelity of the overall performance.

Conclusion
The TFZ No.3 is a great choice for those who want an entry-level IEMs that can fulfill their bass cravings. For those who are interested, you can grab it now at USD$109 on Amazon. There are another two designs – carbon fiber faceplate and TI version. User can choose based on their personal preference.
TFZ provides an affordable alternative for new audiophiles to enter the world of high fidelity. With the warmth injected while not compromising the clarity, TFZ No.3 might be setting a new benchmark for entry-level IEMs.
Well done, TFZ!
How is this compared with the fiio fa7 in terms of bass, clarity and soundstage? Thanks.
I would recommend you to have an audition on FA7 before making any purchase because it is unique – the decay is slow and it is warm. It is a very relaxing sounding IEMs that might compromise a little in clarity and synergy. For soundstage wise, I would prefer TFZ No.3 because the smoothening in FA7 actually makes it sounds congested.
Very good review, I was waiting for this one. I have the ZS10 pro, and I want an upgrade, thanks to you, I am not considering the Kanas Pro and thanks to you I bought my beloved ZS10 Pro … but which ones are better, these or the P1? I know that the P1 don’t have so many bass, I don’t care so much as long as they don’t have an extremely neutral sound, which are better? or neither of them are worth enough to be considered an upgrade of the ZS10 Pro?
Sorry I do not have other models that you mentioned for me to compare. Cannot comment much on this.
You may like this instead… Good performance overall especially if most of what you listen is bass dependent…
TFZ no3 or Ikko oh10 for listening edm, pop and movies?
I would opt Ikko OH10. It is a all-rounder IEMs for all kind of genres.
TFZ No.3 vs Whizzer HE-03 which one u prefer ๐ i like the sound stage and every thing of No.3 but the highs are too shy for me ๐
TFZ No.3 is shy at high – you are right. I did not have any experience with Whizzer HE-03 so cannot comment much on the comparison.
What spinfits would you recommend on this? I don’t know the difference between the cp100 or the cp145
CP145 can give you a deeper insertion as compared to CP100. The bore size is slightly larger for CP145. I would recommend CP145.
Is it 100% free from driver flex?
There are still significant flex when I push the IEM deeper into my ear canal.
tfz no.3 or fiio fh1s, which one would you recommend me?