4 Reasons Why Streaming Services Sound Different, Even at the Same Bitrate

The real reasons high quality streams sound different between platforms
The real reasons high quality streams sound different between platforms

We independently review all our recommendations. Purchases made via our links may earn us a commission. Learn more ❯

There’s more to streaming than just bitrates.

If streaming services offer lossless audio at the same bitrate, they should sound identical, right? After all, digital audio is just data, whether it’s streamed from Tidal, Qobuz, Amazon Music, or Apple Music.

However, many audiophiles and casual listeners report noticeable sound differences between streaming platforms. But why would this happen if the audio files are the same?

The answer lies in a mix of technical and perceptual factors. In this article, we’ll break down the real reasons why streaming services sound different even at the same bitrate, and whether it’s just a case of expectation bias.

1. Streaming Services Process Audio Differently

Audio normalization has become a standard in streaming services.
Audio normalization has become a standard in streaming services.

Streaming platforms process your audio files before they reach your ears. And, the way each service handles this processing can create subtle differences in sound, even when streaming at the same bitrate.

One key factor is Digital Signal Processing (DSP). Some platforms, like Qobuz, avoid DSP entirely, while others apply subtle alterations.

Tidal previously used MQA, which required special decoding and could alter playback depending on the device. Since switching to FLAC, however, Tidal now delivers a more consistent sound across setups.

Apple Music and Amazon Music use standard lossless formats (ALAC and FLAC, respectively). But, they each have their own approach to loudness normalization and buffering that can affect the final sound.

Speaking of normalization, the way streaming services handle volume also shapes what you hear.

Most platforms automatically normalize volume to keep songs at similar levels. Tidal combines ReplayGain with LUFS-based normalization, whereas Apple Music and Spotify rely solely on LUFS. However, this normalization can often affect the music’s dynamic range.

That’s why Qobuz doesn’t normalize volume at all. Some audiophiles have noted that some music sounds more dynamic in Qobuz than on other platforms.

However, turning off normalization in any service eliminates these differences.

Beyond that, even the operating system plays a role. On Windows, DirectSound resamples audio if the system’s sample rate doesn’t match. The same happens with macOS Core Audio unless you adjust settings in Audio MIDI Setup.

To ensure bit-perfect playback, use WASAPI Exclusive Mode (Windows) or apps like Audirvana that dynamically adjust sample rates on macOS.

2. Different Platforms Have Different Masters

Changes in track volume on remastered versions of Abba’s Super Trouper (From: Wikimedia Commons).
Changes in track volume on remastered versions of Abba’s Super Trouper (From: Wikimedia Commons).

The same song can sound different across streaming platforms because they may use different master recordings.

Record labels, not streaming services, decide which versions are distributed. So, one platform may have an older master while another offers a remastered version with different tonal balance and dynamics.

The thing is, mastering shapes every aspect of how music sounds.

Engineers use EQ adjustments, compression, and dynamic range tweaks to craft the final version. These choices can make one version feel open and natural while another sounds more aggressive or compressed.

For example, the “Loudness War” led to heavily compressed remasters that sacrificed dynamic range. This made some tracks sound more fatiguing compared to earlier versions.

These differences become even more noticeable with classic albums that have been remastered multiple times.

The Beatles’ catalog exists in various remasters, some with a warmer analog feel, others with a modern, brighter presentation.

Similarly, The Dark Side of the Moon by Pink Floyd has been remastered several times (1973, 1992, 2003, and 2023), each with subtle but audible changes in clarity and balance.

Unfortunately, while Qobuz and Tidal show detailed mastering information in the metadata, Apple Music and Spotify provide minimal details.

Meaning, most listeners compare different masters without realizing it. They think one service sounds better than another when they’re actually hearing different versions of their favorite songs.

3. Your Setup Might Be Tricking You

Playback systems can highlight or hide the quirks of a song's master.
Playback systems can highlight or hide the quirks of a song’s master.

Even when streaming services offer the same lossless audio, what you hear isn’t just about the platform. Your audio gear can also make streaming services sound noticeably different from each other.

For example, if one platform’s master has slightly more treble energy, it may sound crisp and detailed on neutral headphones. But, if you use a treble-forward setup like the Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro it will sound harsh.

On the other hand, plug some Audeze LCD-2 headphones into a tube amp, and that same track feels smooth and balanced instead.

Of course, the quality of your setup makes a difference too. A high-end DAC and amp may highlight subtle differences between streaming platforms. Meanwhile, a basic setup may make them sound nearly identical.

This explains all those heated arguments online about which service sounds better. Someone listening through their top-shelf system catches details that another person’s simpler equipment misses completely.

Basically, streaming services themselves don’t change based on your gear, but your gear can shape how you perceive those differences.

4. You May Be a Victim of the Placebo Effect

How you feel or think about the platform can change how you 'hear' them.
How you feel or think about the platform can change how you ‘hear’ them.

People naturally hear what they expect to hear.

So, if Qobuz has a reputation for being “audiophile-friendly,” someone might believe it sounds better than Apple Music. When in reality, the actual difference is minimal or nonexistent.

This isn’t just speculation; expectation bias is a well-documented phenomenon in psychoacoustics.

Blind listening tests have put this to the test, and the results aren’t flattering for “golden ears”.

For instance, A well-known study by Meyer & Moran (2007) tricked listeners by inserting a CD-quality (16-bit/44.1kHz) loop into a supposedly high-resolution playback chain. Most participants couldn’t tell when the switch happened.

Beyond expectation bias, the power of suggestion also shapes perception. A streaming app with a sleek, premium design can make users believe it sounds better, even if the audio files are identical.

This same effect happens in high-end audio. Premium cables, gold-plated connectors, and special power supplies often sound better to their owners because the brain justifies the investment.

💬 Conversation: 1 comment

  1. This article contains more mistakes than sentences I guess. Tidal now is maybe more consistent, but lost a lot of quality. Seems Andy G. does know nothing about MQA except preconditions from bad blogs. “Dark side of the moon” had 17 known masters already 10 years ago, today my guess is more than 20. “Well known studies ” often use mediocre equipment and then the statement of “no difference” is just a description of their poor listening setup. Somebody who claims no difference for cables , connectors or PSU just makes a statement of ignorance and poor knowledge about physics. Should not happen in a blog whos name is about honesty.

Leave a Reply