15 Most Hated Audio Equipment & Features, According to Audiophiles

It shouldn't be a surprise that the Bose 901s are on this list.
It shouldn’t be a surprise that the Bose 901s are on this list.

We independently review all our recommendations. Purchases made via our links may earn us a commission. Learn more ❯

From disappointing equipment to infuriating design choices, here’s what drives audiophiles crazy.

Every audiophile has a piece of gear that makes their blood boil—whether it’s a flawed design, an overpriced disappointment, or a feature that nobody asked for. We’ve scoured the audiophile community to compile a definitive list of the most hated audio equipment and features of all time.

Brace yourself—this one’s going to get heated.

1. Bose 901 & Other Bose Systems

Rear of the Bose 901 II featuring eight speakers. (From: Wikimedia Commons)
Rear of the Bose 901 II featuring eight speakers. (From: Wikimedia Commons)

Bose has never claimed to be an audiophile brand, but that hasn’t stopped it from getting under audiophiles’ skin for decades.

Take the Bose 901 speakers, for example. Instead of focusing on direct audio projection like traditional hi-fi setups, Bose leaned into reflected sound. Great for background music at dinner parties, not so great for precision listening. Critics say this approach sacrifices clarity, imaging, and detail, leaving music sounding hollow and undefined, with a bloated low end that muddies the mix.

And it’s not just the 901s. Other Bose products, like the Acoustimass series, get plenty of flak for their weak midrange and reliance on proprietary technology that limits customization.

Sure, Bose knows how to make easy-to-use, mass-market-friendly systems—but for purists who crave accuracy and control, their “better sound through marketing” approach is a constant source of frustration.

2. McIntosh MC-2100 & C-28

McIntosh MC-2100 amplifier on the left and C-28 preamp on the right, two of the brand’s most criticized models. (From: McIntosh)
McIntosh MC-2100 amplifier on the left and C-28 preamp on the right, two of the brand’s most criticized models. (From: McIntosh)

McIntosh is one of the most respected names in high-end audio, which makes its rare flops all the more painful. You expect magic, and instead, you get… well, this.

The MC-2100 amplifier and C-28 preamp are frequently called out as some of the brand’s biggest letdowns. Audiophiles hoping for McIntosh’s signature warmth and refinement were instead met with a sound that felt oddly lifeless—flat dynamics, a surprising lack of detail, and none of that rich, immersive experience the brand is known for.

Some even claim that mid-tier amps from competing brands wipe the floor with these models.

McIntosh still holds a legendary status in the audio world, but the MC-2100 and C-28 serve as a cautionary tale: even the greats can drop the ball sometimes.

3. Polk PSW10 Subwoofer

Polk PSW10 subwoofer, a budget model with underwhelming bass. (From: Polk)
Polk PSW10 subwoofer, a budget model with underwhelming bass. (From: Polk)

Budget subwoofers always come with trade-offs, but the Polk PSW10 takes “compromise” to a whole new level. Instead of delivering deep, punchy bass, it serves up a loose, boomy mess that lacks any real definition—more of a rumble than a rhythm.

Crank up the volume, and things get even worse. Thanks to a poorly designed port, the PSW10 starts wheezing like it’s trying to inflate a balloon rather than produce bass.

Some users say it sounds like air being forced out of a leaky tire—not exactly what you want from a subwoofer.

Rather than adding weight and impact to your system, this thing often just muddies the sound, leaving audiophiles shaking their heads (and not from the bass).

4. AudioQuest Diamond USB Cables

A close look at the AudioQuest Diamond USB cables. (From: AudioQuest)
A close look at the AudioQuest Diamond USB cables. (From: AudioQuest)

Nothing enrages skeptics more than high-end cables with dubious performance benefits, and AudioQuest’s $1,000+ USB cables are a prime example. Claims of improved timing, jitter reduction, and “more natural sound” have been widely mocked, with many arguing that in digital transmission, bits are just bits—making these cables a pure luxury gimmick.

5. Infinity Qa Speakers

A Reddit user posted about receiving Infinity Qa speakers from their neighbor. (From: Reddit)
A Reddit user posted about receiving Infinity Qa speakers from their neighbor. (From: Reddit)

Infinity has made some solid speakers over the years, but the Qa model? Not so much. Advertised as delivering the midrange magic of a three-way design, it instead seemed to forget the whole “midrange” part entirely.

Owners have described the sound as hollow, unbalanced, and about as well-integrated as a bad lip-sync. The woofer and tweeter never quite figured out how to work together, leaving a weird sonic gap right where vocals and instruments should shine.

Sure, the cabinetry looked nice—but if you were hoping for Infinity’s signature sound, this one probably left you wondering if your ears were broken.

6. Any “Audiophile” Network Switch

The back of a Synergistic Research Ethernet Switch UEF featuring multiple Ethernet ports and a power switch. (From: Positive Feedback)
The back of a Synergistic Research Ethernet Switch UEF featuring multiple Ethernet ports and a power switch. (From: Positive Feedback)

The rise of streaming has led to a new wave of questionable audiophile products, and “high-end” network switches are among the most ridiculed. Ethernet already provides bit-perfect transmission, yet companies market $2,000 switches that supposedly reduce noise and jitter—claims that have been debunked time and time again.

7. NAD 4150 Tuner

With scanning failures and stations bleeding together, the NAD 4150 tuner left many users disappointed. (From: Ebay)
With scanning failures and stations bleeding together, the NAD 4150 tuner left many users disappointed. (From: Ebay)

The NAD 4150 was supposed to be a high-end tuner, but thanks to a bad batch of chips, it became more of an endurance test. Users dealt with constant scanning failures, stations bleeding together like a badly tuned AM radio, and reception so unreliable it might as well have been guessing.

Even after multiple replacements, some owners never got a properly working unit. Instead of the smooth, high-fidelity experience expected from NAD, this model became a masterclass in disappointment—one that left many audiophiles questioning their life choices.

8. Bluetooth Turntables (Especially Crosley Models)

The Crosley Cruiser Plus is a budget-friendly Bluetooth record player. (From: Crosley)
The Crosley Cruiser Plus is a budget-friendly Bluetooth record player. (From: Crosley)

For vinyl purists, Bluetooth turntables are like putting a spoiler on a minivan—completely missing the point. And budget suitcase models from Crosley?

Even worse. With flimsy tonearms and cheap cartridges that grind away at records like a toddler with a crayon, these things do more harm than good.

But the real kicker? The Bluetooth transmission squashes the sound, stripping away the warmth and detail that make vinyl worth the hassle in the first place.

A close look at a TOSLINK cable without a keyed connector, with a clear jacket on the fiber optic cable. (From: Wikipedia)
A close look at a TOSLINK cable without a keyed connector, with a clear jacket on the fiber optic cable. (From: Wikipedia)

TOSLINK optical ports are the necessary evil of digital audio—technically useful, but guaranteed to test your patience. Those flimsy little plastic flaps? Yeah, they snap off if you so much as look at them wrong.

And even if they stay intact, you’re not in the clear—many users report random signal dropouts, turning your listening session into a suspense thriller (but not the good kind).

Sure, optical connections are supposed to deliver clean, interference-free sound, but their reliability (or lack thereof) makes them one of the most cursed features in digital audio.

10. HDMI Ports in Audio Gear

A close-up of HDMI ports on the Fiio K19. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
A close-up of HDMI ports on the Fiio K19. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

HDMI was supposed to be the one cable to rule them all—handling both high-quality audio and video with ease. Instead, it’s become a frustrating cycle of forced upgrades. Every few years, a new HDMI standard comes along, and suddenly, your once-premium receiver is outdated or outright useless.

Many audiophiles find that their older, pre-HDMI equipment still works perfectly, while their HDMI-equipped receivers struggle with compatibility issues or simply stop functioning. Rather than future-proofing, HDMI has turned into an expensive game of technological catch-up.

11. 3.5mm Ports on Non-Portable Devices

The front panel of the Sound Blaster X5, showing its 3.5mm inputs and controls. (From: Creative)
The front panel of the Sound Blaster X5, showing its 3.5mm inputs and controls. (From: Creative)

A 3.5mm jack on a smartphone? Perfect. On a high-end desktop amp? Why? These fragile little connectors seem to exist solely to break at the worst possible moment.

They wear out quickly, get loose over time, and feel like a cheap afterthought in otherwise premium gear.

Audiophiles would much rather see a proper 1/4-inch or XLR input—something built to last, not something that makes you wonder if your cable is loose or if your amp just hates you.

12. Overly Sensitive Volume Knobs

Schiit Magni Heresy amp with a black volume knob. (From: Amazon)
Schiit Magni Heresy amp with a black volume knob. (From: Amazon)

Some amplifiers and receivers seem to think volume control should be an extreme sport. A tiny nudge, and suddenly, you’ve gone from a whisper to a full-blown sonic assault. Talk about 0 to deaf in one click.

This is especially maddening for anyone with high-sensitivity speakers or headphones—good luck finding that sweet spot between “barely audible” and “why are my ears bleeding?”

Instead of a smooth, gradual increase, these knobs turn volume adjustment into a game of trial and (mostly) error, leaving users endlessly fiddling to avoid either straining to hear or bracing for impact.

13. Spring Clip Speaker Terminals

A close-up view of a speaker’s spring clip terminal. (From: Yamaha)
A close-up view of a speaker’s spring clip terminal. (From: Yamaha)

Ah, spring clip speaker terminals—the ultimate sign that a manufacturer wanted to save a few cents at the cost of your sanity.

These flimsy, plastic connectors loosen over time, leading to unreliable connections and degraded sound. And don’t even think about using thick, high-quality speaker wire—these clips have all the flexibility of a dollar-store paperclip.

For budget gear, sure, they get the job done. But on anything claiming to be “high-end,” they feel like an insult.

14. “Limited-Edition” Audio Gear

A limited-edition variant of the Audio-Technica M50x headphones in blue and black. (From: Audio-Technica)
A limited-edition variant of the Audio-Technica M50x headphones in blue and black. (From: Audio-Technica)

Some brands love to slap “limited edition” on a product, not because they have to, but because they want to—specifically, to crank up exclusivity and resale value.

Suddenly, a piece of audio gear isn’t just a tool for enjoying music; it’s a collector’s item, a status symbol, a golden ticket for resellers looking to cash in.

Now, if we’re talking about handcrafted, boutique gear made in tiny batches by a lone artisan in a cabin somewhere, fine.

But when big-name manufacturers pull this stunt just to manufacture hype, it’s a slap in the face to real audiophiles who just want quality sound without playing a game of “who can overpay the most on the used market.”

15. Power Conditioners

Furman Merit Series Power Conditioners. (From: Furman Power)
Furman Merit Series Power Conditioners. (From: Furman Power)

Power conditioners are often sold as must-have upgrades for cleaner, purer sound—but many audiophiles aren’t buying it (literally and figuratively).

Sure, if your home’s electrical system is straight out of a horror movie, they might help with interference. But most decent audio gear already has solid power regulation built in.

And yet, some power conditioners cost as much as an actual amplifier. That’s a hefty price tag for something whose benefits are, let’s just say, hotly debated. For many, they’re just another example of the infamous “audiophile tax”—charging a premium for a product that may or may not actually make a difference.

But hey, if it sounds better to you, who are we to argue?

Leave a Reply