Meet the $10 DAC That Calls Out Audiophile Nonsense by Sounding “Perfect”

Another test reveals the truth about high-end DACs.
Another test reveals the truth about high-end DACs.

We independently review all our recommendations. Purchases made via our links may earn us a commission. Learn more ❯

Audiophiles did not take it well.

Some Digital-to-Analog Converters (DACs) are marketed as sonic marvels—fetching prices upwards of $40,000 and promising rich, immersive sound that defies explanation.

A recent blind test led by a professional mastering engineer challenges that idea head-on. The surprising result: a $10 DAC might sound indistinguishable from gear priced 1,000 times higher.

Blind Test Exposes Audiophile Claims

To find out whether expensive DACs really offer better sound, a mastering engineer set up a blind listening experiment—and the results made waves.

The test was straightforward. One version of a track was untouched; the other had passed through a typical digital-to-analog and analog-to-digital conversion loop. Listeners had no idea which was which.

No opinions were asked for. They just had to guess how many times the audio switched between the two.

To remove any influence beyond the sound itself, the engineer stripped away all visual and timing cues. The gear was intentionally unremarkable:

  • DAC: a 15-year-old TC Electronic BMC-2, common in older studios
  • ADC: a MOTU 24Ai interface
  • Cables: unbalanced mini-jacks
  • Monitors: up to the listener—headphones, studio monitors, whatever they normally use

He switched between the versions seven times. Over 1,300 people responded to the poll—and most didn’t hear any difference.

“Nobody could hear the difference,” he said. “The p-value was 0.000000001
 These results are extremely statistically significant.”
Unsurprisingly, AP Mastering’s video triggered a lot of audiophiles. (From: YouTube)
Unsurprisingly, AP Mastering’s video triggered a lot of audiophiles. (From: YouTube)

Nearly 900 participants guessed there had been no switch at all. The takeaway? Once a DAC reaches transparency—meaning it doesn’t color the sound—you’re not supposed to hear a difference. That’s the point.

What made the findings more impactful wasn’t just the result, but how accessible the test was. Anyone with an interface can replicate it:

  • Run a loopback (DAC out → ADC in).
  • Match levels.
  • Compare the recordings blindly.
  • For extra detail, invert one track’s phase to hear what changed.

It’s easy to do, and it cuts through the noise—no marketing, no guesswork, no reviews packed with adjectives. Just real-world results.

Inside the Industry’s Biggest Secret

The reason this test works is because of how DACs are built. Whether a model costs $50 or $50,000, the actual audio conversion is usually handled by the same class of digital chips—widely available, refined, and consistent.

These chips are used across consumer electronics, studio gear, and pro-level devices. Brands may dress them up with fancier cases, upgraded power supplies, or boutique components, but those extras rarely affect how the DAC sounds—at least not if it’s already transparent.

So what drives the price difference? It’s mostly design, branding, and presentation.

You might get a sleeker enclosure or a more robust build, but once a DAC hits the transparency threshold, those enhancements don’t improve what you hear.

Some brands go further, using non-audio chips marketed as high-precision or “more natural.” Others lean on NOS (no oversampling) designs. But these often introduce more measurable distortion, not less, along with ultrasonic noise and reduced dynamic range.

Independent reviewers have backed this up repeatedly.

Audiophile blogger Archimago, for example, has shown that even ultra-budget DACs like Apple’s $10 dongle can measure—and sound—just as clean as high-end models.

Sometimes, the pricier gear even shows more jitter or unwanted artifacts.

The takeaway?

Transparent DAC performance doesn’t scale with price.

The core tech is mature and inexpensive. Paying more doesn’t improve fidelity—it just changes how the product looks, feels, or is perceived.

Perception vs. Reality and What It Means for Listeners

So why do so many people still swear they hear differences between DACs that test the same?

It’s psychological. Expectation bias is powerful. The engineer pointed to the McGurk effect—a phenomenon where your brain changes what you hear based on what you see. That same kind of sensory trick happens with audio. If a product looks premium and costs more, our brains want it to sound better.

That’s why blind tests are such a problem for the high-end audio world. They take away the price tag, the design, the glowing reviews—leaving only the sound. And when that happens, most of the “night and day” differences vanish.

The point isn’t that premium gear has no value. Great build quality, sleek design, and luxury feel all have their place. But those don’t automatically translate into better sound. Once a DAC is transparent, it’s doing its job. You don’t need to chase price to chase fidelity.

For most listeners, this should be good news. It means you can stop worrying about price tags and focus on the music. The gear that gets you to honest, high-fidelity sound is already out there—and it’s not out of reach.

💬 Conversation: 1 comment

  1. A MOTU Interface with 110 dB (A) and mini jacks unbalanced . From Walmart most probably. And music was “God save the queen” blown on a comb with paper. Gimme a break. Statistically proven that most people don’t have trained listening to details, give a sh..t about better sound and use their own tin cans at home to judge. The ability of studio people to “test” highend gear is well known. But of course they would hear the difference in a reasonable high end setup.

Leave a Reply