The pattern of identical wounds is now too consistent for users to write off as bad luck.
AirPods Pro 3 owners are posting alarming reports of ear pain, open cuts, and bleeding after regular use. Many point to the new heart-rate sensor, which seems to press into the same spot inside the ear no matter which tips they use.
As more people share their experiences, a clear pattern is starting to form as the injuries appear too consistent to dismiss as random discomfort.
Here’s what users are discovering and how Apple is responding.
Growing Reports of Ear Injuries
Across Reddit, dozens of AirPods Pro 3 users have shared stories of ear pain and visible wounds. These reports range from minor irritation to cuts that required medical attention.
For instance, Lyao1235 posted images showing bleeding from the left ear after extended wear during airport travel. They described feeling pressure inside the ear shortly before removing the earbud and noticing blood.

Another post by brandonmp shared matching wounds on both ears in a thread from 27 days ago.
Many users initially mistook the discomfort for pimples or irritation, only to later find identical sores forming on both ears. The pain and injuries consistently appeared around the inner ear canal and the tragus, i.e., the small cartilage bump near the opening. Some also noticed small bumps or bloodstains after wiping their ears when the earbuds slipped out.

Unfortunately, even spending 10 minutes trying to find a good fit didn’t eliminate the pain and pressure for some users.
And while still relatively rare, users observed that these issues happen more frequently than with the AirPods Pro 2. Because the injuries appeared in the same locations across different people and ear tip sizes, the trend points to a potential design-related pressure point rather than isolated fit problems.
The Heart-Rate Sensor Debate
Many users point to the new heart-rate sensor as the pain point. The sensor, which is a black circular element on the inner surface of each earbud, rests against the ear canal and often presses on the back of the tragus when seated.
According to reports, this creates a consistent pressure spot that doesn’t change with different ear tip sizes.

However, the experiences vary. Some users say the sensor sits completely flush and causes no discomfort, even during sleep. Others describe feeling a slight indent or roughness when running a finger across the sensor area, correlating that texture with localized soreness or visible cuts.
Because outcomes differ from unit to unit, a few commenters speculate about manufacturing variance, for example, sensors that sit slightly proud or sub-flush, while others recall past AirPods units where misaligned seams created sharper edges.
There’s also the heat issue.
Users who kept continuous heart-rate monitoring enabled noted a steady warmth where the sensor contacts the skin. Combined with a fixed pressure point and, in some reports, a faint edge, this warmth could plausibly contribute to skin irritation over time.
User Solutions and Workarounds
The search for solutions has produced different results across Reddit threads. Some of them include the following:
- Insertion technique
- Tip size adjustments
- Short-break testing
- Reduce heat and sensors
- Add a soft barrier
- Stop use & seek care
Insertion technique
Several users found relief by changing the angle and depth of insertion.
To do this, just rotate the earbud slightly as you seat the tip, then stop as soon as the seal forms. If you feel the tip pushing against cartilage or the stem levered against the ear, remove and reinsert more shallowly.
Tip size adjustments
While many reported trying every tip size without relief, it’s still worth a try as fit can change the pressure points. Some users felt better after sizing down, others needed different sizes per ear, and at least one reported relief by sizing up.
Small tips can also seat the earbud too deeply and increase cartilage pressure, while larger tips may distribute contact more evenly.
Short-break testing
Some users said discomfort faded after roughly a week of short, regular use. So, if initial wear is uncomfortable, try brief sessions, about 30-60 minutes, a few times a day, then reassess.
Reduce heat and sensors
A few reports noted steady warmth during continuous heart-rate monitoring. If you experience heat or tenderness, turn off continuous HR in settings and avoid long, uninterrupted sessions to reduce heat buildup.
Add a soft barrier

DamonLight Silicone Ear Hooks for AirPods Pro 3 (From: Amazon)
As a temporary cushion, some users placed a thin hydrocolloid patch or a trimmed transparent bandage where the earbud contacts the sore spot (keeping adhesive outside the canal). A silicon earbud cover or ear hook can also work.
Just make sure nothing obstructs the tip or blocks vents/sensors, and stop if irritation worsens.
Stop use & seek care
If you notice bleeding, an open sore, swelling, fever, or persistent pain, stop using the earbuds, clean the area gently, apply over-the-counter antibiotic ointment around the outer canal edge (not deep inside), and consult a clinician.
Online posts aren’t diagnoses, while a professional can evaluate fit, skin injury, and infection risk.
Apple’s Response and Returns
Apple’s handling of the complaints has been inconsistent so far, according to user reports. Some customers who visited Apple Stores about ear pain or visible rough seams were told no manufacturing defect had been identified.
In one case, Reddit user Miry404 said their return request was denied for hygiene reasons, even after showing staff the problem and explaining that they had already tested all tip sizes.
Other users described similar experiences online, saying Apple’s retail staff were unable to process exchanges unless the earbuds showed clear structural defects. A few managed to secure replacements through online support channels, but these cases were less common.
The mixed responses have left many users returning to the AirPods Pro 2, which several said felt comfortable immediately after switching back. For those users, the newer design simply wasn’t worth the risk, especially at a price exceeding $300.