I Tried the Colorfly CDA-M2 and Discovered an Affordable Pocketable Sonic Microscope

The packaging and overall design of the Colorfly CDA-M2 is quite smart looking. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
The packaging and overall design of the Colorfly CDA-M2 is quite smart looking. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

We independently review all our recommendations. Purchases made via our links may earn us a commission. Learn more ❯

Colorfly’s latest dongle is a giant killer in terms of technicalities but you’ll have to like a bit of brightness with them.

Colorfly CDA-M2

(70%)
Our Review Guidelines ⧉
Evaluated over: 5 weeks
Bottom Line

The Colorfly CDA-M2 is a dream for detail enthusiasts on a budget. Its imaging and clarity are top-notch, rivaling even the priciest dongles. It excels in delivering fine details but has a slightly bright tonal response, which enhances its strengths. Comfort-wise, it’s solid—with ample power and no detectable noise, even with sensitive IEMs. However, its high power draw from USB is a minor trade-off. If you need detailed sound or want to balance warm headphones, the CDA-M2 is a great choice. For a sole dongle, it might be a bit much given other options.

Form
Dongle
DAC Chipset
CS43198
Balanced Output
4.4mm
Max Output Power
250 mW
BT Version
-
Weight
27 g
What We Like 😍
  • Exquisitely resolving across the frequency band
  • Drives most portable headphones and IEMs
  • No noise to speak of
  • The screen is quite useful
What We Don't Like 🤢
  • High-ish power draw
  • Peers have more features
  • Some might prefer a warmer sound
Thank you to Shenzhen Audio for providing the Colorfly CDA-M2 for review purposes.

Colorfly are no amateurs in the personal audio business. They burst into the headphone scene in 2010 with the explosively named C4 DAP which combined retro-futuristic looks with audio that surpassed most portable players at the time. Fast-forward 14 years and Colorfly still are going strong with a full suite of personal audio products.

The CDA-M2 is currently Colofly’s top-of-the-line dongle DAC. It’s available in milled aluminum and titanium bodies with the former having two color finish options – dark grey and violet. Inside the thing we have the regular dual CS43198 combo with a dedicated opamp output stage.

On paper, the Colorfly CDA-M2 looks pretty much in line with the rest of the offering around the hundred-dollar price point. Read on and we’ll try to find what sets the CDA-M2 apart from the rest!

One Minute Review Video

Watch: Colorfly CDA M2 short review #shorts

Design and Build

The overall appearance and feel of the CDA-M2 is more subdued than Colorfly’s masterclass in bombastic design with the C4. The build quality is good and I adore that the unit can be taken apart by removing a single bolt – yay for repairability!

The outputs on the CDA-M2 look a bit like a barrel of a handgun. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
The outputs on the CDA-M2 look a bit like a barrel of a handgun. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

In hand, the CDA-M2 feels light but solid enough not to feel flimsy. All of the ports have no play and the outputs are well-fitted to the chassis so plugging and unplugging won’t wear out the soldering on the PCB.

Controls

Interacting with the Colorfly CDA-M2 is done via three buttons on the side of the unit. The +/- rocker adjusts the volume in default conditions, and toggles option states. The pushbutton is used to activate the screen, and on long press enter and exit the menu.

The button layout works well and can be worked even by touch in a pocket. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
The button layout works well and can be worked even by touch in a pocket. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

The menu allows for a decent range of adjustments – display brightness, orientation and sleep time can be changed. The usual range of DAC low-pass filter options are also present and as always, I don’t feel that they change much about the fundamental sound character of the CDA-M2. The gain adjustment is convenient if one plans to use the unit with high-impedance headphones.

A curious option is the ability of the CDA-M2 to output SPDIF digital audio via the 3.5mm jack.

Under the Hood

The Colorfly CDA-M2 uses a pair of CS43198 DAC chips followed by a pair of 2001T opamps which are a bit of an enigma as I couldn’t find any info about them. In this configuration, true balanced drive is achieved because a single CS43198 can only output a pseudo-balanced analog signal.

This is the control side of the PCB, note the STC microprocessor. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
This is the control side of the PCB, note the STC microprocessor. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

On the PCB one also finds the central processing unit, a couple of oscillators, and the CT7601 USB input chip. Colorfly advertises that the CDA-M2 uses an “FPGA DSP”, however, I was unable to gauge what exactly is being processed.

This is where the magic happens, the larger pair of chips are the DACs which feed into two smaller opamps. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
This is where the magic happens, the larger pair of chips are the DACs which feed into two smaller opamps. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

The CDA-M2 is shipped with an 11cm USB-C to USB-C ribbon cable. Curiously enough, you have to plug the end with the arrow in the source for it to work.

Sadly, Apple users need to bring their own OTG cables because there’s no Lightning cable included.

To support the screen over the pcb, a chunk of foam is used. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
To support the screen over the pcb, a chunk of foam is used. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

Another thing to keep in mind when using the CDA-M2 portably is the power draw. Because there’s a screen, two DACs and a dedicated output stage, it is notably higher than more simple dongles. At around 115mA power draw from the USB port, the Colorfly dongle won’t be easy on the battery but you get very versatile driving capability.

How Does the Colorfly CDA-M2 Sound?

The Colorfly CDA-M2 was tested using the Simgot EA1000, NF Audio NE4, Thieaudio Monarch MK3, Linsoul x HBB Jupiter IEMs, Sennheiser HD6XX headphones, and my Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ smartphone. I listened to a diverse set of tracks, both locally stored and streamed.

Let’s start with some practicalities. The CDA-M2 is very capable of handling both high and low-impedance loads. Usually easier to drive headphones and IEMs have plenty of juice at low gain and no noise even with more sensitive IEMs. The 300 ohm Sennheiser HD6XX needed bumping up to high gain, especially with more dynamic jazz and classical recordings.

The output 3.5mm jack is used here. A way chunkier jack might interfere with the protruding 4.4mm output. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
The output 3.5mm jack is used here. A way chunkier jack might interfere with the protruding 4.4mm output. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

In terms of overall signature, the CDA-M2 is quite analytic with a minimum leaning towards brightness. Mind you, the the brightness tendency comes from a slight emphasis on high frequencies rather than bass lightness. The low-end is quite good, depending on the music and the downstream gear.

The CDA-M2 comes with a ribbon type USB-C cable. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
The CDA-M2 comes with a ribbon type USB-C cable. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

For the price, my objections on the tone are minor because the standout here is resolution and imaging where the CDA-M2 punches above its price category. With careful system matching the brightness becomes a non-issue unless a coloration towards warmth is required.

Comparisons

Within the price range I’d consider the FiiO KA17 a worthy competitor to the Colorfly CDA-M2. It offers a similar quality sound with a different tuning more akin to the ESS house sound – a bit vivid but with less emphasis on technicalities. The FiiO can also provide more power in a 32-ohm load both on desktop and mobile mode.

The Colorfly CDA-M2 is less feature-rich because the KA17 is able to perform on-board DSP which can be a game-changer if set correctly.
This is a typical mobile setup with the CDA-M2. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)
This is a typical mobile setup with the CDA-M2. (From: Rudolfs Putnins)

Let me throw a wildcard in here – the Qudelix 5K! It’s roughly the size of the CDA-M2 and offers the same power output, battery-powered operation, and Bluetooth. It also costs less than the Colorfly unit. Not to mention that it’s a real DSP powerhouse. The Qudelix can’t touch the CDA-M2 in terms of technicalities but that’s the only hit the Colorfly lands on it.

Where to Buy

Who Should Buy This?

Detail junkies on a budget will be seventh heaven with the CDA-M2! Both the detail and imaging on offer here can only be exceeded by the very top-end dongles and battery-powered portables.

One should take care when matching the CDA-M2 to IEMs, brighter models like the already technically impressive Simgot EA1000 will be too much of a good thing.

Final Thoughts

The Colorfly CDA-M2 is one of those pieces of gear that does one thing very well. This time it’s detail and imaging. The price to pay is a slightly bright tonal response which probably contributes to the strength of this dongle.

There’s very little to complain about regarding creature comforts with the CDA-M2. There’s plenty of power for most sane loads and I couldn’t detect any noise even with very sensitive IEMs. The power draw from USB is a bit on the high side, however not out of the ordinary for a dongle with a dedicated amp stage.

If you need to peer inside a certain recording or just maybe balance out, especially warm headphones or IEMs, the CDA-M2 is an easy recommendation. As the first or sole dongle the CDA-M2 will be harder to swallow, especially with other options at the price-point.

What’s in the Box?

  • Colorfly CDA-M2 dongle
  • USB-C to USB-C cable
  • Manual

Technical Specifications

  • Form: Dongle DAC and Amp
  • Frequency Response (Hz): 20 Hz – 20 KHz
  • THD+N: -114dB (BAL)
  • SNR:130dB
  • Output impedance: 0.56Ω (SE), 0.83Ω (BAL)
  • Output power: 125mW@32Ohm (SE), 250mW@32Ohm (BAL)
  • Output voltage: 2Vrms (SE), 4Vrms (BAL)
  • Data rates (USB): PCM – 32bit (44.1 – 384kHz), DSD256, DoP256
  • Data rates (Optical & Coax): PCM – 24bit (44.1 – 192kHz coax, 96kHz optical)
  • Weight (g): 27g

Leave a Reply