He outlines what really changed in the industry and why most people haven’t noticed them yet.
Many new speakers look impressive on specs alone, yet listeners often notice that they fall short once real music starts playing. Gian Piero Matarazzo, former Audio Review lab engineer, says this problem is not accidental. He believes modern designers rely on habits that hurt how speakers actually sound due to three patterns in today’s design culture.
Here’s how he explains the problem and why he thinks speaker design lost its way.
Reason 1: Over-Reliance on Measurements
The first major problem, according to Matarazzo, is that modern speaker design has become a slave to the graph.
Speaking at the ROMA HI-FIDELITY show, he remembered testing a Technics/Panasonic speaker years ago. Its frequency response was ruler-flat from 28 Hz to 25 kHz, staying within 0.5 dB.
“It could have been calibration for measurement microphones, and instrumentally it was fabulous,” Matarazzo said in an interview with Velut Luna.
“But the sound wasn’t great.”
This obsession with perfect measurements ignores how acoustics is an imperfect science filled with countless variables. Room positioning, phase behavior, and cable characteristics all affect the sound. How music changes over time matters more than static plots on a computer screen.
That’s why he believes designers need to look beyond frequency response. Instead, they need to study the time domain.

Because of this, his methods break from standard practice as well. For instance,while building custom reference speakers for Emidio Frattaroli, Matarazzo ignored the usual textbook recipe of fourth-order crossover filters, which are complex networks that sharply divide frequencies and look perfect on paper.
He applied his three-morning rule: any design has to satisfy him for three consecutive mornings of listening. The original fourth-order crossover passed every lab test. But by the third morning, the music felt constrained and over-controlled.
So he tore it out and replaced it with simple first-order acoustic filters using gentle 6 dB/octave slopes. This allowed more overlap between drivers and a response that looks “wrong” on measurement graphs.
With that change, the speakers threw soundstages that reached beyond the room and preserved proper depth layering even when instruments played at different volume levels.
According to him, this choice would horrify most engineers as it allows more overlap between drivers and looks “wrong” on measurement graphs, though.
Reason 2: Lack of Real Listening Experience
The second fatal flaw in modern speaker design is cultural rather than technical. Too many designers approach speakers as engineering problems rather than musical instruments.
“Engineers design objects for music, but don’t listen to music,” Matarazzo stated bluntly.
“I’ve never seen an engineer, except for a few exceptions, truly listen.”
He names a few of those ‘exceptions’ as Mario Murace, Enrico Rossi, and the late Renato Giussani. These designers, he says, started from a genuine passion for music and then built serious technical skills on top of it.
On the other hand, today’s designers operate in reverse. They emerge from universities armed with CAD software and signal theory. But they lack a fundamental listening experience.
Matarazzo calls them “keyboard geniuses” who trust simulations more than their ears.

Matarazzo worries that this balance is often missing in modern development. In his view, many designers lean too heavily on CAD models and lab data. So, they risk speakers that seem tuned for beautiful graphs rather than for how they actually sound in real rooms.
Reason 3: Cost-Cutting Over Sound Quality
The third killer of great speaker design is economics. Decisions that once served sound quality now serve spreadsheet logic.
One huge example he gave was the four vs two screws scenario.
Mounting a woofer properly requires four screws for best performance. The extra screws ensure even pressure around the driver’s frame, preventing air leaks and vibrations that muddy the bass. They keep the driver perfectly aligned as it pumps back and forth thousands of times per second.
To accountants, though, two screws cost less than four, maybe saving fifty cents per speaker. Multiply that by thousands of units, and someone’s spreadsheet looks better. They ignore the fact that using only two screws allows the driver to shift slightly, creating distortion. That uneven mounting pressure causes resonances that color the sound.
This penny-pinching infects every part of modern speaker construction. Film capacitors in crossovers get replaced with cheaper electrolytics. Internal wiring shrinks from the right gauge to barely adequate. Cabinet bracing vanishes wherever customers won’t see it missing.

On the flip side, Matarazzo points to Chario as the gold standard of uncompromised design. When designer Mario Murace wanted specific drivers, the company bought them with no questions asked. Sales director Carlo Vicenzetto handled the business side but never interfered with technical choices.
That separation between engineering and accounting lets designers chase excellence without compromise. If one driver cost twice as much but sounded better, they used it. When proper cabinet construction required expensive materials and complex techniques, they went ahead and did it.
Unfortunately, today, many companies flip that logic. Marketing teams set price points before design even starts, while purchasing managers choose components based on bulk discounts rather than acoustic quality. And production engineers trim anything that might slow down the assembly line.
How to Use Matarazzo’s Advice as a Listener
Matarazzo’s warnings are aimed at designers, but they are useful for listeners too. His main point is simple: graphs and specs are helpful, yet your ears and your room decide whether a speaker is worth owning.
When you audition speakers, pay attention to how the music behaves over time, not just to first impressions. Notice whether the soundstage stays stable when the music gets louder or whether instruments keep their place. Also consider if the system still feels “alive” after an hour, not just for a few impressive tracks.
Here are practical ways to apply his thinking:
- Bring your own familiar music and listen for emotional impact, not just detail.
- Ask brands or dealers how the speakers were voiced and tested in real rooms.
- Look closely at build choices that hint at care or corner-cutting.
- Spend serious time on placement and room setup before judging a speaker.
Ultimately, great speakers happen when passionate listeners use engineering knowledge to serve musical goals. They don’t happen when engineers treat music as an academic exercise that needs perfect measurements and accounting department approval.
The gentleman is absolutely spot on. This issue of audio engineers reminds me of the old joke, that a musicologist is a person who can read music, but can’t hear it.
The current obsession with graphs and data, ( very prevalent in the digital is better than analogue debate), ignores the multiple subtleties in the nature of sound, resonance, harmonics and how the human ear responds. A great speaker let’s you feel the music as much as hear it. Forget the technical minutiae, just listen. Your ears will tell which is a great speaker and which is not.
Absolutely correct. Engineers need to use their ears more than what they are taught in the class and have a genuine appreciation for music rather than the maths and science of engineering.
Anyone talking about cable characteristics (snake oil) lost my respect. Just like many well known audio companies lost my respect when they start selling thousands of dollars for a 1m cable.
Agreed, I felt the same way. Turned off at that point.
I’ll keep my 30 year old 802s😂
Wow, he is describing the way I design speakers – with my ears and not using REW. I use low order X-overs because speaker blending is easier and electrical impedance and phase anomalies are greatly reduced, reducing the load on amplifiers. I use the Golden Ratio for my speaker cabs and I use an isobarik design for the woofers greatly reducing vibration, distortion, and making cheaper woofers sound better. My speakers are cheaper and easier to build because of the isobarik set up I employ – while Wilson uses heavy cabs to reduce vibrations my cabs can be much much lighter, especially for my 74 YO body.
It’s pretty much a stone-cold fact that speakers today sound better than ever. The number of brands making absolutely astounding speakers is almost beyond comprehension. A few thousand dollars or euros gets you something today that was four times more expensive just 20 years ago. I enjoy the point that Gian Piero Matarazzo is making because there are nuggets of gold in there, and he articulates real problems. Still, unfortunately, his “ultimate conclusion” that speaker quality isn’t what it used to be is completely false by any standard of measurement, whether it’s physics, SPL meter, room software, or the contents of your musical soul… Speakers, dollar for dollar, are better than ever, and that is a fact.
I agree 100% with Matarazzo!!!!!!!!!! That’s why I design and construct my own speakers – they sound far bettter than most $$$$$$$$$$$ speakers including and especially including Wilson. I use low order X-overs because they don’t screw-up the electrical properties of the speakers. I use a DATS3 to measure the electrical effects. I also use the Golden Ratio for all my bass cabs and I place my woofers in an “isobaric” configuration – one directly facing the other which greatly reduces distortion, cab vibrations and stiffens the woofer cones to get better results from inexpensive woofers which also have a high SPL – usually foam edged woofers. I also have been using ‘point source’ drivers such as Lowthar and the Dayton Audio 6.5″ Point Source driver that I cross at 300Hz – eliminating comb filtering and phase shifts because of the crossover in the midrange and low HF Xover (2.5K) that most speaker builders use. The effect of the point source full range drivers are immediately noticed. FWIW I use OB construction for those drivers which results in the best frequency response and how they are ‘voiced’. My friend and I listened to the $750K Wilson’s and drove home to hear how my DIY speakers compare. We were both amazed that my < $800 speakers sound better and clearer – no phase shifts or comb filtering!!!!!! My speakers aren't pretty -just painted – but I put my $$$ into sound and NOT looks.
Any decent audio engineer will be usng his ears as much or more than the measurements. The tech gear is just there to help you get the sound you want.