Man Faces Jail Time After Using Bots to Earn Millions on Music Streaming Platforms

A Danish man's music streaming fraud scheme gets busted.
A Danish man’s music streaming fraud scheme gets busted.

We independently review all our recommendations. Purchases made via our links may earn us a commission. Learn more ❯

He also needs to pay back what he earned on the platforms, plus a fee.

An unnamed 53-year-old man from East Jutland, Denmark was sentenced to 18 months in prison on Thursday due to music streaming fraud. The Aarhus court found him guilty of using bots and fake accounts to artificially inflate play counts on hundreds of his tracks.

This gave him at least 2 million Danish kroner ($290,811) in royalties between 2013 and 2019, ultimately making him the country’s 46th highest-earning composer from 2014 to 2017.

The Man and His Scheme

A Danish man committed streaming fraud between 2013 and 2019. (From: Headphonesty)
A Danish man committed streaming fraud between 2013 and 2019. (From: Headphonesty)

The Danish Rights Alliance reported that the defendant owned 69 accounts on platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, and YouSee Musik. On Spotify alone, he had 20 accounts.

He was originally accused of making around DKK 4.38m (US$600K) from fake streams. But, the court said it didn’t have enough data to confirm the exact amount. Yet, they determined that the man had made at least 2 million Danish kroner (around US$300K) from fake streams.

Streaming fraud refers to paying for fake play counts with bots, click farms, and fake accounts. This breaks streaming platform rules and can get you kicked off these services.

Aside from fake streams, the unnamed man from East Jutland also stood guilty of copyright violation for 37 tracks.

Most of these songs were altered versions of existing music. Only the length and tempo of the tracks were changed and then uploaded under his name.

The folk music band from Denmark, Dreamers Circus, is among the numerous artists whose music was illegally copied by the 53-year-old fraudster. (From: DR News)
The folk music band from Denmark, Dreamers Circus, is among the numerous artists whose music was illegally copied by the 53-year-old fraudster. (From: DR News)

The Verdict

Alongside the 18-month prison sentence, the court ordered the seizure of 2 million Danish kroner, divided between him and his company. It also levied a 200,000 Danish kroner fine against him.

Since this is the country’s first case of the violation, the verdict received widespread praise.

Maria Fredenslund, CEO and founder of the Danish Rights Alliance, said the ruling emphasized the gravity of the crime.

“We are pleased that the court has affirmed that streaming fraud is deeply criminal and serious. It’s a historic verdict that sends a strong signal about the severity of stream manipulation challenges.” she stated.
KODA's new chair, Anna Lidell, weighs in on the verdict. (From: KODA)
KODA’s new chair, Anna Lidell, weighs in on the verdict. (From: KODA)

Anna Lidell, the newly-elected chair of the collecting society KODA, had similar sentiments. She cited the case’s importance in protecting artists’ rights.

“It sends a message that you cannot infringe upon our rights as songwriters. The man cheated his way to millions of listens, but also violated copyright by speeding up the tracks and releasing them. It’s a mockery to those who struggle to make music every day and earn peanuts.”

Senior specialist prosecutor Amir Amirian noted how the decision sets a legal benchmark for future cases. It also serves as a strong warning to potential fraudsters.

Prosecutor Amir Amirian says this case is the first of its kind. (From: DR News)
Prosecutor Amir Amirian says this case is the first of its kind. (From: DR News)
“This is important because if we see similar cases in the future this will be the primary case to refer to. This is actually illegal, it’s not a gap in legislation or something like that,” Amirian said.

The Industry’s Battle Against Streaming Fraud

A 2021 study conducted by France’s Centre national de la musique (CNM) found fake streams on popular services like Spotify (1.1%), Qobuz (1.6%), and Deezer (2.6%).

This reveals a systemic problem that distorts streaming data, taking away royalties from artists who deserve them.

54% of fraud detected comes Deezer's Family plan and 6% from the free-trial plan. (From: CNM.fr)
54% of fraud detected comes Deezer’s Family plan and 6% from the free-trial plan. (From: CNM.fr)

Rasmus Rex Pedersen, an associate professor specializing in music streaming research at Roskilde University, criticized the industry for its slow reaction.

“The streaming services have had several years to develop tools to combat this type of fraud and apparently they haven’t been doing a very good job,” he commented.

Groups like the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and Bundesverband Musikindustrie (BVMI) took legal action to break up networks involved in streaming manipulation. A notable win was the closure of SP-Onlinepromotion.com, a German service known for selling fake streams.

“Streaming manipulation has no place in music. The practice constitutes fraud. And the perpetrators and enablers of this illegal activity cannot be allowed to divert revenue away from the artists who create the music,” said Frances Moore, the Chief Executive of IFPI.

Preventative Strategies in Place

On Spotify’s top 10,000 most-listened to tracks, 96% of fraud comes from new releases. (From: CNM.fr)
On Spotify’s top 10,000 most-listened to tracks, 96% of fraud comes from new releases. (From: CNM.fr)

According to industry experts, the fight against streaming fraud needs innovative methods for its detection. Following CNM’s study, Spotify updated its royalty system to address three primary concerns:

  • Fake Streams: Spotify now charges labels and distributors if they detect high fake streams on their songs. They also improved their fake stream detection technology and are working with others in the industry to fight fraud.
  • Fair Compensation: In 2024, songs must have at least 1,000 streams a year to earn royalties. This rule tackles the problem of artists not getting paid for songs with few streams because of fees. By focusing on songs that are played more, Spotify ensures the money goes to artists who need it.
  • Gaming the System: Creators make money from white noise and nature sounds by making these tracks shorter and putting them in playlists to get more streams. Spotify now only pays royalties if these tracks are longer than two minutes. They also have a lower payout than music streams.
Ludovic Pouilly, Deezer’s SVP of Institutional & Music Industry Relations. (From: EMIC Paris/YouTube)
Ludovic Pouilly, Deezer’s SVP of Institutional & Music Industry Relations. (From: EMIC Paris/YouTube)

Deezer is also acting against streaming fraud, especially because of the rapid increase in AI-generated music.

“Over the past 10 years, we have developed multiple algorithms to detect different kinds of fraud. And, we currently have a team of 15 people working with fraud detection as part of their job role.” said Ludovic Pouilly, Deezer’s SVP of Institutional & Music Industry Relations.

The move involves creating tools that recognize and tag music made by AI. These tags inform artists, labels, and listeners about the origin of music on their platform. Deezer’s Radar technology also detects AI content by scanning and identifying songs, including altered ones.

Leave a Reply